Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Home ground Thread

Frullens
(@frullens)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg Moderator
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1652
 

I'm in Melbourne, and so you may call me niave and not in touch with the emotional ties to LO

But for those saying what about the 16,000 people packed into LO last week (which is its capacity) 

one point of view, in response, is 16,000 should be a low low ballpoint for a big Sydney NRL club, and instead we should be aiming for an average of 25-30k which is completely possible. 

We average 22.5k at Accor over 46 home games.

We average 18k at SFS over 20 games.

 

We average 12k at LO and 11k at CSS over 94 and 91 games respectively**.

10k average difference at the bigger stadiums - it's pretty simple business.

If you can average 25k in a 30k capacity stadium- you have a big crowd and the atmosphere.

 

The outlier is Commbank where we average only 10.5k over 16 games. But not sure if this is representative. If er played full time at Commbank, and are competitive the average should more like SFS or Accor.

 

**note - CSS is only 1000 less people average than LO, is interesting- given the sacredness LO is spoken about compared to CSS, and the better games LO usually gets (Sunday afternoon) compared to CSS which usually gets  6pm Fridays evening games against Gold Coast

 

Fact is we are limiting ourselves playing out of grounds with such low capacity grounds.

Top 8 2023


   
Barra reacted
ReplyQuote
(@mercy-rule)
Wests Magpies Harold Matts
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 359
 

I don't get the issue with using Accor as a replacement for LO. I'd prefer it to other options.

I keep reading about the lack of "atmosphere" there. I don't buy that argument. Have a winning team and the fans will create the atmosphere. By all means play some games at CSS with a hope to make that the home ground in the years ahead but, by comparison to what Accor offers right now in terms of standard of facilities, ease of transport etc, CSS is light years behind. 


   
ReplyQuote
(@tigertownsfs)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1577
 

Posted by: @frullens

I'm in Melbourne, and so you may call me niave and not in touch with the emotional ties to LO

But for those saying what about the 16,000 people packed into LO last week (which is its capacity) 

one point of view, in response, is 16,000 should be a low low ballpoint for a big Sydney NRL club, and instead we should be aiming for an average of 25-30k which is completely possible. 

We average 22.5k at Accor over 46 home games.

We average 18k at SFS over 20 games.

 

We average 12k at LO and 11k at CSS over 94 and 91 games respectively**.

10k average difference at the bigger stadiums - it's pretty simple business.

If you can average 25k in a 30k capacity stadium- you have a big crowd and the atmosphere.

 

The outlier is Commbank where we average only 10.5k over 16 games. But not sure if this is representative. If er played full time at Commbank, and are competitive the average should more like SFS or Accor.

 

**note - CSS is only 1000 less people average than LO, is interesting- given the sacredness LO is spoken about compared to CSS, and the better games LO usually gets (Sunday afternoon) compared to CSS which usually gets  6pm Fridays evening games against Gold Coast

 

Fact is we are limiting ourselves playing out of grounds with such low capacity grounds.

big difference between LO and the major stadiums IMHO with regard to numbers is family access. LO is an absolute pain with kids.

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Magpies NSW Cup
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 3160
 

Posted by: @frullens

I'm in Melbourne, and so you may call me niave and not in touch with the emotional ties to LO

But for those saying what about the 16,000 people packed into LO last week (which is its capacity) 

one point of view, in response, is 16,000 should be a low low ballpoint for a big Sydney NRL club, and instead we should be aiming for an average of 25-30k which is completely possible. 

We average 22.5k at Accor over 46 home games.

We average 18k at SFS over 20 games.

 

We average 12k at LO and 11k at CSS over 94 and 91 games respectively**.

10k average difference at the bigger stadiums - it's pretty simple business.

If you can average 25k in a 30k capacity stadium- you have a big crowd and the atmosphere.

 

The outlier is Commbank where we average only 10.5k over 16 games. But not sure if this is representative. If er played full time at Commbank, and are competitive the average should more like SFS or Accor.

 

**note - CSS is only 1000 less people average than LO, is interesting- given the sacredness LO is spoken about compared to CSS, and the better games LO usually gets (Sunday afternoon) compared to CSS which usually gets  6pm Fridays evening games against Gold Coast

 

Fact is we are limiting ourselves playing out of grounds with such low capacity grounds.

With respect, the averages you quote at Accor and SFS are at best meaningless and IMO actually go  against your argument.

The Accor averages include the "glory years" of 2005 - 2010 and more importantly include 7 "easter Monday" games against Parra with >30K crowds as a result of the Easter Show Crowds so not exactly representative.

 

Worse is the SFS crowds which were not only during our "glory years" but also included semi finals. For SFS crowds to only be 6K more than LO average and only slightly more than LO max is telling. If we played at SFS now, the numbers would be the same as Commbank. This is NOT an outlier. This is the state of the club.

 


   
ReplyQuote
Garry
(@garry)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 4507
Topic starter  

Posted by: @mercy-rule

I don't get the issue with using Accor as a replacement for LO. I'd prefer it to other options.

I keep reading about the lack of "atmosphere" there. I don't buy that argument. Have a winning team and the fans will create the atmosphere. By all means play some games at CSS with a hope to make that the home ground in the years ahead but, by comparison to what Accor offers right now in terms of standard of facilities, ease of transport etc, CSS is light years behind. 

The place is dead unless you are pushing close to 40k

 

In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)


   
ReplyQuote
Frullens
(@frullens)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg Moderator
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1652
 

Posted by: @tiger5150

With respect, the averages you quote at Accor and SFS are at best meaningless and IMO actually go  against your argument.

The Accor averages include the "glory years" of 2005 - 2010 and more importantly include 7 "easter Monday" games against Parra with >30K crowds as a result of the Easter Show Crowds so not exactly representative.

 

Worse is the SFS crowds

which were not only during our "glory years" but also included semi finals. For SFS crowds to only be 6K more than LO average and only slightly more than LO max is telling. If we played at SFS now, the numbers would be the same as Commbank. This is NOT an outlier. This is the state of the club.

The averages quoted are for regular home games.

They are separate to the 4 finals games at SFS where we averaged 34.5k and the 4 finals games at Accor where we average 56.5k

 

In respect to Easter monday - exactly you can't play big derby games at LO and CSS and get any more than their sub 20k capacities.

 

A good admin would be should be aiming for at least 4 or 5 big event derby games (Penrith, parra, Bulldogs, Dragons, souths) a year which pull 30k plus - irrespective of form.

 

In respect of 'glory days'- if we are going to plan our club around not making finals - then I'm done.

 

We have made the finals 3 times in 25 years. We should be aiming to reverse that for our next 25. 

We should be aiming to become a big club that expects to make the finals every year.

This post was modified 1 month ago by Frullens

Top 8 2023


   
Tiger5150 reacted
ReplyQuote
Mike
 Mike
(@mike)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 3952
 

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @mercy-rule

I don't get the issue with using Accor as a replacement for LO. I'd prefer it to other options.

I keep reading about the lack of "atmosphere" there. I don't buy that argument. Have a winning team and the fans will create the atmosphere. By all means play some games at CSS with a hope to make that the home ground in the years ahead but, by comparison to what Accor offers right now in terms of standard of facilities, ease of transport etc, CSS is light years behind. 

The place is dead unless you are pushing close to 40k

 

Rubbish. I’ve been there when just a dozen blokes behind the goal posts has the place rocking. It’s up to the crowd, not the stadium. 

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@tigertownsfs)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1577
 

“Club with lowest membership in league moves to largest stadium in country”


   
ReplyQuote
Frullens
(@frullens)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg Moderator
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1652
 

What's the arguments against Western Sydney Stadium (aka Commbank) - other than Parra have their leagues club next door?

Top 8 2023


   
ReplyQuote
Frullens
(@frullens)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg Moderator
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1652
 

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

“Club with lowest membership in league moves to largest stadium in country”

Playing devils advocate

Richo would argue that described souths when he moved to homebush and now they are in the top 2 or 3 memberships in NRL - with Brisbane and Melbourne 

Top 8 2023


   
ReplyQuote
Garry
(@garry)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 4507
Topic starter  

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @mercy-rule

I don't get the issue with using Accor as a replacement for LO. I'd prefer it to other options.

I keep reading about the lack of "atmosphere" there. I don't buy that argument. Have a winning team and the fans will create the atmosphere. By all means play some games at CSS with a hope to make that the home ground in the years ahead but, by comparison to what Accor offers right now in terms of standard of facilities, ease of transport etc, CSS is light years behind. 

The place is dead unless you are pushing close to 40k

 

Rubbish. I’ve been there when just a dozen blokes behind the goal posts has the place rocking. It’s up to the crowd, not the stadium. 

 

It's not rubbish mate, the place is good for big event games, should not be used at all for events under 30000. A 20000 crowd in a 70 000+ stadium is quite simply laughable and makes the game look second rate. 

If you cannot half fill a stadium then you have no right playing there.

 

In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)


   
ReplyQuote
(@tigertownsfs)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1577
 

Posted by: @frullens

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

“Club with lowest membership in league moves to largest stadium in country”

Playing devils advocate

Richo would argue that described souths when he moved to homebush and now they are in the top 2 or 3 memberships in NRL - with Brisbane and Melbourne 

and yet if every member turns up their stadium is less than half full.

WSS wasn’t built when he moved south’s to Accor. If it was he probably would have moved there.

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@dirty-reds)
Balmain Tigers SG Ball
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 598
 

Posted by: @frullens

What's the arguments against Western Sydney Stadium (aka Commbank) - other than Parra have their leagues club next door?

It's Parramatta's ground. Always has been, always will be.

It's not only the leagues club - the whole Parra CBD is united behind the Eels, down to the pubs having blue and gold memorabilia everywhere. 

Balmain tried moving there 30 years ago and it was a dismal failure. 

Circumstances are obviously different now, but I'd still hate us to end up out there. 

There are pros and cons to all the solutions, but I'd prefer most of them over moving to Parramatta full time. 

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@jedi-tiger)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 3902
 

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @jedi-tiger

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

Hypothetic question after listening to how Richo talks about choosing the most lucrative stadium. Is there a scenario where the club plays 10+ games at Commbank? Reasonable train and car access from the southwest (equal to Accor at least), future metro from inner west direct to stadium, massive corporate facilities. Obvious criticisms will be that it didn’t work in the 90s for the Sydney Tigers or really for the WT the last few years (one of the 6 stadiums we would play at each year) but what if we played ALL our games there and there was no other option to be a member at LO or CSS? Would the state government offer a sweet heart deal to get another permanent resident at the ground? Could that work?

commbank ground I think is fine aper from the parramatta leagues club right next door, it kind of never feels like home.

two Tennants in there however I think the state government would be keen on a game there every week so I'm sure a deal would be just as good as Accor

From a bias perspective I live 10 minutes from commbank but if could choose one it would be Accor 

 

I think that is an easy fix, develop a partnership with club Parramatta. Promote that as the place to go for home games, put on events that encourage people to attend that club instead.

 

attending parramatta leagues club Mate is that what you mean? no from me I can't see the supporters going for that at all. 

it was good at parramatta when  you guys could do the ambush events in that bar however before games. 

Accor has that more neutral feel about it though, that you.could take it over type of thing 

 


   
ReplyQuote
Garry
(@garry)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 4507
Topic starter  

Posted by: @jedi-tiger

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @jedi-tiger

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

Hypothetic question after listening to how Richo talks about choosing the most lucrative stadium. Is there a scenario where the club plays 10+ games at Commbank? Reasonable train and car access from the southwest (equal to Accor at least), future metro from inner west direct to stadium, massive corporate facilities. Obvious criticisms will be that it didn’t work in the 90s for the Sydney Tigers or really for the WT the last few years (one of the 6 stadiums we would play at each year) but what if we played ALL our games there and there was no other option to be a member at LO or CSS? Would the state government offer a sweet heart deal to get another permanent resident at the ground? Could that work?

commbank ground I think is fine aper from the parramatta leagues club right next door, it kind of never feels like home.

two Tennants in there however I think the state government would be keen on a game there every week so I'm sure a deal would be just as good as Accor

From a bias perspective I live 10 minutes from commbank but if could choose one it would be Accor 

 

I think that is an easy fix, develop a partnership with club Parramatta. Promote that as the place to go for home games, put on events that encourage people to attend that club instead.

 

attending parramatta leagues club Mate is that what you mean? no from me I can't see the supporters going for that at all. 

it was good at parramatta when  you guys could do the ambush events in that bar however before games. 

Accor has that more neutral feel about it though, that you.could take it over type of thing 

 

No club Parramatta is the old RSL, down the road from the stadium.

 

In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)


   
ReplyQuote
Page 123 / 131
Share: