Just about perfect mate.

Thanks mate, I have thought that way for a really long time. Consistency is important but really only within the same match, I don't care if the ref i...

A couple of things on this post, I agree with you so much mate. In regards to the bunker, I would have tge referee ref the game as if there is n...

Ch 9 has different footage to the bunker but i agree it was a try.

The only way it would have happened if PVL included in the package he was pushing. This didn't happen.

We lose so much by moving Brooks from 6. Hastings 7 and Brooks 6 are halves moving forward.

I agree but my information is CSS isn't getting any funding.

Problem is that there isn't a smart option now, all options have significant issues that make them unsuitable from different points of view.

Playing hom at 13 does nothing to help the fact we are short on troops. I don't think he would have enough impact in the middle to play 13.

A massive no to Brooks at 9 imo.

I didn't mind when we had them all out there, it pushed Brooks wider and actually led to his try. I do not want Brooks at hooker though as we lose too...

Around the $50m mark, so not a rebuild or anything but should be able to get some stuff done.

Pretty good summary mate.

LO has some funding coming in the next couple of weeks.

Brooks service is fine but we lose a lot in attack when we move him to 9, 6 is his spot.