Wests Tigers admin/...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

[Sticky] Wests Tigers admin/governance discussion

Garry
(@garry)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4998
 

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

What clowns. I would love to hear any inside info regarding the nature of the split and what each faction wanted

I think they were arguing over who got the last prawn at their most recent board meeting.

 

In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)


   
Mike, Jedi Tiger, Tiger_Alex and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@helmesy)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4758
 

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

What clowns. I would love to hear any inside info regarding the nature of the split and what each faction wanted

I think they were arguing over who got the last prawn at their most recent board meeting.

 

I would suggest that it is all about control.

For the three to be banned from the premises tells me they were staging a revolution.

 

Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!


   
Mike reacted
ReplyQuote
(@tigertownsfs)
Wests Magpies NSW Cup
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2007
 

I’d just like to know what Ramone and Burgess really want. We know Andreachio was the guy who commissioned and accepted the review but Ramone has been silent and know she’s trying to delete Andreachio etc. it’s pretty important if she is still trying to unwind the changes


   
Forever 9th reacted
ReplyQuote
Enumerator
(@enumerator)
Junior Pathways
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 134
 

Self interest is Poison.


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
(@helmesy)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4758
 

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

I’d just like to know what Ramone and Burgess really want. We know Andreachio was the guy who commissioned and accepted the review but Ramone has been silent and know she’s trying to delete Andreachio etc. it’s pretty important if she is still trying to unwind the changes

Romero 😂

 

Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!


   
ReplyQuote
Barra
(@barra)
Balmain Tigers SG Ball
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 534
 

Romero and Burgess both Magpies stalwarts, probably provides a clue?


   
Jedi Tiger reacted
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3839
 

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

What clowns. I would love to hear any inside info regarding the nature of the split and what each faction wanted

I think they were arguing over who got the last prawn at their most recent board meeting.

 

I would suggest that it is all about control.

For the three to be banned from the premises tells me they were staging a revolution.

 

As they should. The HBG guys that were incompetent on the WT board, dont suddenly become competent on the HBG board and I think the review and subsequent purge at WT has sparked some ideas at HBG and the old guard are undertaking their own purge to stop it happening again.

 


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
(@helmesy)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4758
 

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

What clowns. I would love to hear any inside info regarding the nature of the split and what each faction wanted

I think they were arguing over who got the last prawn at their most recent board meeting.

 

I would suggest that it is all about control.

For the three to be banned from the premises tells me they were staging a revolution.

 

As they should. The HBG guys that were incompetent on the WT board, dont suddenly become competent on the HBG board and I think the review and subsequent purge at WT has sparked some ideas at HBG and the old guard are undertaking their own purge to stop it happening again.

 

Yes, but there is some thought that those removed were more in favour of the review than the people still there.

 

Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!


   
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3839
 

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

What clowns. I would love to hear any inside info regarding the nature of the split and what each faction wanted

I think they were arguing over who got the last prawn at their most recent board meeting.

 

I would suggest that it is all about control.

For the three to be banned from the premises tells me they were staging a revolution.

 

As they should. The HBG guys that were incompetent on the WT board, dont suddenly become competent on the HBG board and I think the review and subsequent purge at WT has sparked some ideas at HBG and the old guard are undertaking their own purge to stop it happening again.

 

Yes, but there is some thought that those removed were more in favour of the review than the people still there.

 

THats the point I'm trying to make...the three that have been removed and banned should have been staging a revolution, the HBG board needs a similar cleanout and obviously the old guard are purging to prevent the cleanout.

 


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
(@kiwitiger)
Wests Magpies Harold Matts
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 176
 

Only good thing in all of this is everyone is an adult and this will all be sorted out rationally and with maturity. No leaks either as they all will have wests tigers best interests at heart.

I am now off to get my daughter a real life unicorn.


   
Mercy Rule, Joel Helmes, Forever 9th and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
Forever 9th
(@forever-9th)
Wests Tigers Supporter
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 66
 

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

What clowns. I would love to hear any inside info regarding the nature of the split and what each faction wanted

I think they were arguing over who got the last prawn at their most recent board meeting.

 

I would suggest that it is all about control.

For the three to be banned from the premises tells me they were staging a revolution.

 

As they should. The HBG guys that were incompetent on the WT board, dont suddenly become competent on the HBG board and I think the review and subsequent purge at WT has sparked some ideas at HBG and the old guard are undertaking their own purge to stop it happening again.

 

Yes, but there is some thought that those removed were more in favour of the review than the people still there.

 

THats the point I'm trying to make...the three that have been removed and banned should have been staging a revolution, the HBG board needs a similar cleanout and obviously the old guard are purging to prevent the cleanout.

 

Does this have anything to do with the Balmain revolt a few weeks ago?

 


   
ReplyQuote
Garry
(@garry)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4998
 

Posted by: @forever-9th

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

What clowns. I would love to hear any inside info regarding the nature of the split and what each faction wanted

I think they were arguing over who got the last prawn at their most recent board meeting.

 

I would suggest that it is all about control.

For the three to be banned from the premises tells me they were staging a revolution.

 

As they should. The HBG guys that were incompetent on the WT board, dont suddenly become competent on the HBG board and I think the review and subsequent purge at WT has sparked some ideas at HBG and the old guard are undertaking their own purge to stop it happening again.

 

Yes, but there is some thought that those removed were more in favour of the review than the people still there.

 

THats the point I'm trying to make...the three that have been removed and banned should have been staging a revolution, the HBG board needs a similar cleanout and obviously the old guard are purging to prevent the cleanout.

 

Does this have anything to do with the Balmain revolt a few weeks ago?

 

No I don't think so.

 

In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)


   
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3839
 

Posted by: @forever-9th

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @tigertownsfs

What clowns. I would love to hear any inside info regarding the nature of the split and what each faction wanted

I think they were arguing over who got the last prawn at their most recent board meeting.

 

I would suggest that it is all about control.

For the three to be banned from the premises tells me they were staging a revolution.

 

As they should. The HBG guys that were incompetent on the WT board, dont suddenly become competent on the HBG board and I think the review and subsequent purge at WT has sparked some ideas at HBG and the old guard are undertaking their own purge to stop it happening again.

 

Yes, but there is some thought that those removed were more in favour of the review than the people still there.

 

THats the point I'm trying to make...the three that have been removed and banned should have been staging a revolution, the HBG board needs a similar cleanout and obviously the old guard are purging to prevent the cleanout.

 

Does this have anything to do with the Balmain revolt a few weeks ago?

 

I dont think Balmain has that much relevance over anyone these days unfortunately.

 


   
ReplyQuote
Forever 9th
(@forever-9th)
Wests Tigers Supporter
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 66
 

@tiger5150 not sure thats right. Just look how much they spend on them compared to wests. Anyway it just seems to big a coincidence.


   
Tiger5150 reacted
ReplyQuote
Garry
(@garry)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4998
 

Posted by: @forever-9th

@tiger5150 not sure thats right. Just look how much they spend on them compared to wests. Anyway it just seems to big a coincidence.

I think this is just the HBG being the HBG, I'm not too concerned at this point.

 

In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)


   
ReplyQuote
Page 112 / 113
Share: