Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Rd 21 Dragons v Wests Tigers Live Game Day Thread (Contains Spoilers)

(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3867
 

Posted by: @mike

Anyone else think it will Brooks & Laurie in the halves next week?

 

hope so.

 


   
MickeyB and Mike reacted
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 79)
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1586
 

Posted by: @grovetiger

Well, that's consecutive Spoons. Anyone else numb to following a poor side? 

Losing really used to rattle me, it's almost comical now. 

im numb as tbh… Our captain just resigned until the end of 2026!! Had a lead at half time then…. Jack shit

I’m nearly finished with this mob


   
ReplyQuote
(@jedi-tiger)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4362
 

next year can't be any worse guys


   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 79)
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1586
 

Posted by: @jedi-tiger

next year can't be any worse guys

is there an 18th team coming in 😎🤓😝😜🤪🤨🤨🤨🤨

 


   
Mike and Jedi Tiger reacted
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3867
 

What the hell was that at the end when Stef is held a metre out from the line and a dragons player is literally lying on his legs with his arms wrapped around his legs and the ref waits 5 mins before telling Stef to relpay the ball?

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 79)
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1586
 

Posted by: @jedi-tiger

Posted by: @mike

Anyone else think it will Brooks & Laurie in the halves next week?

can Laurie play any 7 ? potential for next year maybe ?

 

no

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3867
 

Posted by: @Anonymous

Posted by: @jedi-tiger

Posted by: @mike

Anyone else think it will Brooks & Laurie in the halves next week?

can Laurie play any 7 ? potential for next year maybe ?

 

no

 

What makes you say that Logan? between Wakeham, Laurie and Smith who are available Laurie seems to me the best option. Genuinely interested in your reasoning.

 

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 79)
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1586
 

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @Anonymous

Posted by: @jedi-tiger

Posted by: @mike

Anyone else think it will Brooks & Laurie in the halves next week?

can Laurie play any 7 ? potential for next year maybe ?

 

no

 

What makes you say that Logan? between Wakeham, Laurie and Smith who are available Laurie seems to me the best option. Genuinely interested in your reasoning.

 

 

I seriously think if Marshall made himself available this season… we’d not have the spoon locked away. And I’m not a Marshall fan 🤷‍♂️. I’ve nearly had enough of this mob 

 


   
ReplyQuote
The Last Ronin
(@the-last-ronin)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2216
 

Just finished watching and honestly never thought we were going to win that at any stage. Too many simple errors in this football team. 


   
Mike and Tiger5150 reacted
ReplyQuote
Mike
 Mike
(@mike)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4568
Topic starter  

Posted by: @jedi-tiger

next year can't be any worse guys

Thats what the said at the beginning of this year and hear we are 17th, worst than last year. 

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@mercy-rule)
Balmain Tigers SG Ball
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 510
 

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @jedi-tiger

next year can't be any worse guys

Thats what the said at the beginning of this year and hear we are 17th, worst than last year. 

 

Yes, it'll be a proud achievement if it happens. To win back-to-back wooden spoons and finishing lower on the table in the second year. Sheens can use it as a banner on flyers for his new demolition business. Freakish talents that man.

 


   
ReplyQuote
Barra
(@barra)
Balmain Tigers SG Ball
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 538
 

First game I've watched in a while - didn't bother watching a few of our recent losses (especially the Cowboys game).

The regression in this team is remarkable since the last game I saw. Clunky, poor discipline and many look to have lost confidence. In that I would include Toa and Jnr - who should have just backed himself and ran over the top of their fullback on his second clean break.

Interestingly the player who showed the most commitment and confidence was Daine, and he had a very good game.

Has losing Brooks made that much of a difference?


   
Mac_Tiger and Mike reacted
ReplyQuote
(@tiger-symmetry)
Balmain Tigers SG Ball
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 526
 

I think the game that Daine Laurie played last night poses a few interesting questions.Firstly,the whole vexed issue of our halfbacks has probably been the greatest bone of contention and furore in this club for the last 5 years at least,and ongoing,but with the departure of Luke Brooks and the Fainu signings at least there lies the potential for meaningful change,but to what point do  we clear the decks?I believe Laurie showed last night that he can be a valuable asset to our playing stocks and was always bewildered as to why he was never given a shot in close,given the ball skills he displayed while playing at fullback.It seems strange to me(almost as strange as the decision to offload Jacko Hastings),why Daine was at the very bottom of the pecking order.  
 I’ve no idea how or who makes the final call on these decisions in the inner sanctum,but I’m well sure of the fact that the contingency plan this year left our cupboard bare of halfbacks which in my view is primary cause of our lamentable status in the here and now.So my ultimate question is are we going to let Daine Laurie,now a player with a degree of experience,sail out the doors and back into the Panther fold for meagre dollars?If we’re to allow that,I’d think it a myopic and stupid decision.I believe we have to at least keep the cupboard semi-stocked otherwise we’re engaging in the racket of repeating our greatest errors.I think Daine displayed in all facets of his game last night,that he should be at least part of the contingency plan into the future.


   
Mac_Tiger reacted
ReplyQuote
(@mac_tiger)
Balmain Tigers SG Ball
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 347
 

Posted by: @tiger-symmetry

I think the game that Daine Laurie played last night poses a few interesting questions.Firstly,the whole vexed issue of our halfbacks has probably been the greatest bone of contention and furore in this club for the last 5 years at least,and ongoing,but with the departure of Luke Brooks and the Fainu signings at least there lies the potential for meaningful change,but to what point do  we clear the decks?I believe Laurie showed last night that he can be a valuable asset to our playing stocks and was always bewildered as to why he was never given a shot in close,given the ball skills he displayed while playing at fullback.It seems strange to me(almost as strange as the decision to offload Jacko Hastings),why Daine was at the very bottom of the pecking order.  
 I’ve no idea how or who makes the final call on these decisions in the inner sanctum,but I’m well sure of the fact that the contingency plan this year left our cupboard bare of halfbacks which in my view is primary cause of our lamentable status in the here and now.So my ultimate question is are we going to let Daine Laurie,now a player with a degree of experience,sail out the doors and back into the Panther fold for meagre dollars?If we’re to allow that,I’d think it a myopic and stupid decision.I believe we have to at least keep the cupboard semi-stocked otherwise we’re engaging in the racket of repeating our greatest errors.I think Daine displayed in all facets of his game last night,that he should be at least part of the contingency plan into the future.

I agree. Imagine how Starford would have gone outside Laurie getting all of that early ball.

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@tgrzmn)
Wests Magpies Harold Matts
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 222
 

@the-last-ronin I recall from the commentary on channel 9 last nightGus Gould said, its amazing how many tries are scored when the ball hits the ground. My thought was that we should have scored 5 tries by then as they seemed to pass the ball to no one or behind the players more often than it went to hand.

Not a preferred attacking play. 


   
Garry reacted
ReplyQuote
Page 7 / 8
Share: