Forums
Wests Tigers
Wests Tigers Podcas...
Wests Tigers Podcas...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Wests Tigers Podcast episode 0259

 
RSS
 Joel Helmes
(@helmesy)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4523
Topic starter May 22, 2023 9:25 am  

Oh, what a night! All your post Wests Tigers v Cowboys analysis on this big edition of the Podcast, including the Draft, and Buy, Sell, or Hold. Enjoy! https://weststigerspodcast.com.au/wests-tigers-podcast-0259/

Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!


   
Quote
 Tiger5150
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3708
May 22, 2023 10:45 am  

Another great poddy. How could it not be after Saturdays game. Declan my best on ground this week. Some good points and he agrees we me on everything so he is obviously a good judge.


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
Skippa13
 Skippa13
(@skippa13)
Balmain Tigers SG Ball
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 555
May 22, 2023 12:26 pm  

That first 2:30 intro was absolute bliss!


   
Mac_Tiger, Joel Helmes and Garry reacted
ReplyQuote
 Jedi Tiger
(@jedi-tiger)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4305
May 22, 2023 1:56 pm  

great intro

good pod

 


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
Mike
 Mike
(@mike)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4476
May 22, 2023 2:32 pm  

It was Brooks, Joffa waited for at half time…


   
Tiger5150 reacted
ReplyQuote
Garry
 Garry
(@garry)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4849
May 22, 2023 2:51 pm  

Posted by: @mike
↑

It was Brooks, Joffa waited for at half time…

Thanks mate, I couldn't remember who was being interviewed.

 

In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)


   
Mike reacted
ReplyQuote
 Eastiemagpie
(@eastiemagpie)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 901
May 22, 2023 10:42 pm  

Nice work gents. I enjoyed the analysis of the game and other talk points.


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share: