@jedi-tiger im not saying Madden is that good, what I’m saying is that he’s performed pretty much as well as Brooks has and would be earning a fraction of the money and also has plenty of potential improvement in him.
Theres a fairly strong argument for saying he should be in the first grade team to see his much he can improve.
Won’t happen though as Brooks is now undroppable but he deserves an opportunity before we throw him in the bin.
Brooks is now undroppable
Fine, as long as club is willing to Trade him, even if its only for Cash.
@celtic_tiger I think if Brooks gets dropped it is for Hastings at 7. if the club wanted Madden they would sign him by now
@mac_tiger Madden is rubbish , any club can buy him for 2023 and have not. He will not make it in nrl, superleage for him like Croft
My preference is Hastings and AD combo. I was responding to logan's view.
A Madden at $500,000 is infinitely better than a Brooks on a million.
Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!
A Madden at $500,000 is infinitely better than a Brooks on a million.
With respect Helmesy, it is irrelevant because Madden is off contract and Brooks isnt so the practicalities of the situation is that even if we can get rid of Brooks, his cost to leave on our cap plus Maddens contract will be the same cost as keeping Brooks and letting Madden go, and Brooks is a better player than Madden.
spot on cost of $500k for Madden and Brooks supplement of 500k is the 1 million dollars, we are better keeping brooks
spot on cost of $500k for Madden and Brooks supplement of 500k is the 1 million dollars, we are better keeping brooks
No we are not. He holds us back. Progress won’t be made until he is gone.
spot on cost of $500k for Madden and Brooks supplement of 500k is the 1 million dollars, we are better keeping brooks
No we are not. He holds us back. Progress won’t be made until he is gone.
Jock Madden is not progress.
spot on cost of $500k for Madden and Brooks supplement of 500k is the 1 million dollars, we are better keeping brooks
No we are not. He holds us back. Progress won’t be made until he is gone.
Jock Madden is not progress.
Maybe not but Brooks certainly isn’t.
spot on cost of $500k for Madden and Brooks supplement of 500k is the 1 million dollars, we are better keeping brooks
No we are not. He holds us back. Progress won’t be made until he is gone.
Jock Madden is not progress.
Maybe not but Brooks certainly isn’t.
Thats the whole point of the discussion. The discussion isnt whether Brooks is a good player.
Brooks is the status quo. Keeping Madden and getting rid of Brooks does not progress the status quo in any respect. Playing ability or cap money. In this scenario only, we are better off with the status quo.
Progress would be replacing Brooks & Madden with better. Go (not you, the club) and find better.
@mike disagree not all Brooks fault
He’s a fair player just doesn’t have any footy smarts. Wests Tigers need a smart organising half back, someone who can control the game and knows how to close out a game, and that’s just not Brooks.
Was hoping it was Hastings. Jury is out for mine even after 3/4 of a season.
spot on cost of $500k for Madden and Brooks supplement of 500k is the 1 million dollars, we are better keeping brooks
No we are not. He holds us back. Progress won’t be made until he is gone.
Jock Madden is not progress.
Maybe not but Brooks certainly isn’t.
Thats the whole point of the discussion. The discussion isnt whether Brooks is a good player.
Brooks is the status quo. Keeping Madden and getting rid of Brooks does not progress the status quo in any respect. Playing ability or cap money. In this scenario only, we are better off with the status quo.
Progress would be replacing Brooks & Madden with better. Go (not you, the club) and find better.
It’s a bit chicken and the egg though. Who would come here as half given the support for Brooks? I think Brooks needs to go first to show our hand. Certainly his contract should not be renewed.
