Team prediction v M...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Team prediction v Manly

(@Anonymous 79)
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1586
 
Posted by: @tiger5150
Posted by: @loganr21

I’d go with 

1Laurie

2 To’a 

3 Kapoa

4 Naden

5 Maumalo c

6 Douehi c

7 Hastings

8 Tamou c

9 Brooks c

10 Ofhengaue 

11 Garner

12Leilua

13Peachey c

14 Twal 

15 Musgrove 

16 Brown 

17 Tuilagi 

Lets play the BIG 5

Any evidence that Brooks would be a better 9 than Simpkins?

He’d run rings around Tuki 🤷‍♂️

 


   
ReplyQuote
Mike
 Mike
(@mike)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4538
 
Posted by: @tiger5150
Posted by: @loganr21

I’d go with 

1Laurie

2 To’a 

3 Kapoa

4 Naden

5 Maumalo c

6 Douehi c

7 Hastings

8 Tamou c

9 Brooks c

10 Ofhengaue 

11 Garner

12Leilua

13Peachey c

14 Twal 

15 Musgrove 

16 Brown 

17 Tuilagi 

Lets play the BIG 5

Any evidence that Brooks would be a better 9 than Simpkins?

None whatsoever. In fact when Brooks plays 9 the attack it seriously diminished. Brooks is a lock IMO aka Cameron Murray style. 


   
Tiger5150 reacted
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3803
 
Posted by: @mike
Posted by: @tiger5150
Posted by: @loganr21

I’d go with 

1Laurie

2 To’a 

3 Kapoa

4 Naden

5 Maumalo c

6 Douehi c

7 Hastings

8 Tamou c

9 Brooks c

10 Ofhengaue 

11 Garner

12Leilua

13Peachey c

14 Twal 

15 Musgrove 

16 Brown 

17 Tuilagi 

Lets play the BIG 5

Any evidence that Brooks would be a better 9 than Simpkins?

None whatsoever. In fact when Brooks plays 9 the attack it seriously diminished. Brooks is a lock IMO aka Cameron Murray style. 

IMO he is too small for that role.

 

Ill save everyone the googling.......Brooks is 2 inches shorter than Murray and only 2kg lighter but at 90kgs, Murray is an outlier in the pack, not the norm.

 

An inconvenient truth is that Brooks is currently probably our best 6 since Moses.

 


   
ReplyQuote
Mike
 Mike
(@mike)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4538
 
Posted by: @tiger5150
Posted by: @mike
Posted by: @tiger5150
Posted by: @loganr21

I’d go with 

1Laurie

2 To’a 

3 Kapoa

4 Naden

5 Maumalo c

6 Douehi c

7 Hastings

8 Tamou c

9 Brooks c

10 Ofhengaue 

11 Garner

12Leilua

13Peachey c

14 Twal 

15 Musgrove 

16 Brown 

17 Tuilagi 

Lets play the BIG 5

Any evidence that Brooks would be a better 9 than Simpkins?

None whatsoever. In fact when Brooks plays 9 the attack it seriously diminished. Brooks is a lock IMO aka Cameron Murray style. 

IMO he is too small for that role.

 

Ill save everyone the googling.......Brooks is 2 inches shorter than Murray and only 2kg lighter but at 90kgs, Murray is an outlier in the pack, not the norm.

 

An inconvenient truth is that Brooks is currently probably our best 6 since Moses.

 

You don’t need to be a beast in the lock position the way the game is developing.

What we need is a ball playing lock with speed and Brooks fits the bill. He’s a good defender.

Imaging having:

1) Laurie

6) Doueihi 

7) Hastings

9) Brown

13) Brooks

 

That gives us lots of options in attack and defence won’t suffer. With appropriate outside backs this combination will score many on both sides of the field. 


   
Tiger5150 reacted
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3803
 
Posted by: @mike
Posted by: @tiger5150
Posted by: @mike
Posted by: @tiger5150
Posted by: @loganr21

I’d go with 

1Laurie

2 To’a 

3 Kapoa

4 Naden

5 Maumalo c

6 Douehi c

7 Hastings

8 Tamou c

9 Brooks c

10 Ofhengaue 

11 Garner

12Leilua

13Peachey c

14 Twal 

15 Musgrove 

16 Brown 

17 Tuilagi 

Lets play the BIG 5

Any evidence that Brooks would be a better 9 than Simpkins?

None whatsoever. In fact when Brooks plays 9 the attack it seriously diminished. Brooks is a lock IMO aka Cameron Murray style. 

IMO he is too small for that role.

 

Ill save everyone the googling.......Brooks is 2 inches shorter than Murray and only 2kg lighter but at 90kgs, Murray is an outlier in the pack, not the norm.

 

An inconvenient truth is that Brooks is currently probably our best 6 since Moses.

 

You don’t need to be a beast in the lock position the way the game is developing.

What we need is a ball playing lock with speed and Brooks fits the bill. He’s a good defender.

Imaging having:

1) Laurie

6) Doueihi 

7) Hastings

9) Brown

13) Brooks

 

That gives us lots of options in attack and defence won’t suffer. With appropriate outside backs this combination will score many on both sides of the field. 

That spine doesnt excite me. IMO Simpkin is the best 9 in the club (moot point with Api coming) and I think Brooks would be a waste of space at 13.

 

You dont need to be a beast in the lock position the way the game is developing.........if you have other beasts in the pack.

 

Look at teams with "smaller" locks, Roosters, Souffs, Melbourne at times (Cheese)...they have monster packs and can afford the luxury of Cam Murray not bashing in attack because Burgess is smashing out 200m a game. If we have Brooks at 13 you are effectively taking a forward out of the rotation and we have barely hung on in the middle battle, at best.

 


   
ReplyQuote
Frullens
(@frullens)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg Moderator
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1749
 
Posted by: @mike
Posted by: @tiger5150
Posted by: @mike
Posted by: @tiger5150
Posted by: @loganr21

I’d go with 

1Laurie

2 To’a 

3 Kapoa

4 Naden

5 Maumalo c

6 Douehi c

7 Hastings

8 Tamou c

9 Brooks c

10 Ofhengaue 

11 Garner

12Leilua

13Peachey c

14 Twal 

15 Musgrove 

16 Brown 

17 Tuilagi 

Lets play the BIG 5

Any evidence that Brooks would be a better 9 than Simpkins?

None whatsoever. In fact when Brooks plays 9 the attack it seriously diminished. Brooks is a lock IMO aka Cameron Murray style. 

IMO he is too small for that role.

 

Ill save everyone the googling.......Brooks is 2 inches shorter than Murray and only 2kg lighter but at 90kgs, Murray is an outlier in the pack, not the norm.

 

An inconvenient truth is that Brooks is currently probably our best 6 since Moses.

 

You don’t need to be a beast in the lock position the way the game is developing.

What we need is a ball playing lock with speed and Brooks fits the bill. He’s a good defender.

Imaging having:

1) Laurie

6) Doueihi 

7) Hastings

9) Brown

13) Brooks

 

That gives us lots of options in attack and defence won’t suffer. With appropriate outside backs this combination will score many on both sides of the field. 

The ball playing lock need to engage the defenders by threatening to run, then pass as first receiver to the halves.

Brooks was playing first receiver at 7 for the last 8 years and showed through his move to 6 that he needs more time and space.

I'm open to seeing how AD goes at 13 but not sure Brooks is a 13. 

Top 8 2023


   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 79)
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1586
 

How bout having the actual 5 captains in our 17 for the first time this year?

 


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
Mike
 Mike
(@mike)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4538
 
Posted by: @frullens
Posted by: @mike
Posted by: @tiger5150
Posted by: @mike
Posted by: @tiger5150
Posted by: @loganr21

I’d go with 

1Laurie

2 To’a 

3 Kapoa

4 Naden

5 Maumalo c

6 Douehi c

7 Hastings

8 Tamou c

9 Brooks c

10 Ofhengaue 

11 Garner

12Leilua

13Peachey c

14 Twal 

15 Musgrove 

16 Brown 

17 Tuilagi 

Lets play the BIG 5

Any evidence that Brooks would be a better 9 than Simpkins?

None whatsoever. In fact when Brooks plays 9 the attack it seriously diminished. Brooks is a lock IMO aka Cameron Murray style. 

IMO he is too small for that role.

 

Ill save everyone the googling.......Brooks is 2 inches shorter than Murray and only 2kg lighter but at 90kgs, Murray is an outlier in the pack, not the norm.

 

An inconvenient truth is that Brooks is currently probably our best 6 since Moses.

 

You don’t need to be a beast in the lock position the way the game is developing.

What we need is a ball playing lock with speed and Brooks fits the bill. He’s a good defender.

Imaging having:

1) Laurie

6) Doueihi 

7) Hastings

9) Brown

13) Brooks

 

That gives us lots of options in attack and defence won’t suffer. With appropriate outside backs this combination will score many on both sides of the field. 

The ball playing lock need to engage the defenders by threatening to run, then pass as first receiver to the halves.

Brooks was playing first receiver at 7 for the last 8 years and showed through his move to 6 that he needs more time and space.

I'm open to seeing how AD goes at 13 but not sure Brooks is a 13. 

Doueihi would be a waste at 13.


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
(@kiwitiger)
Wests Magpies Harold Matts
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 172
 

All i know is i would keep playing jacko and kenny even though they are injured and give AD the rest of the year off as it doesn't matter. That should do wonders for squad harmony


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
(@campo)
Wests Magpies Harold Matts
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 262
 
Posted by: @loganr21

How bout having the actual 5 captains in our 17 for the first time this year?

 

Haha goes to show what a farce the 5 captain thing is


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 79)
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1586
 

@frullens well we’re less than 24hrs from knowing what the team will be. Maybe the best option would be 

6 Brooks 

7 Douehi 

13 Hastings

But I think Joe has the 13 jersey set in stone atm


   
Frullens reacted
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3803
 
Posted by: @loganr21

@frullens well we’re less than 24hrs from knowing what the team will be. Maybe the best option would be 

6 Brooks 

7 Douehi 

13 Hastings

But I think Joe has the 13 jersey set in stone atm

If Hastings is fit to play, I think we see

 

4 Douiehi

6 Brooks

7 Hastings

13 Joe O

 


   
Joel Helmes and Garry reacted
ReplyQuote
Garry
(@garry)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4965
 

Apparently no AD

286170791 10227704644700712 2932607289504750131 n

In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
(@helmesy)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4738
Topic starter  
Posted by: @garry

Apparently no AD

286170791 10227704644700712 2932607289504750131 n

Maybe a run in reserve grade first?

Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!


   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2
Share: