Do we know that the HolmanBarnsgroup will make the findings of the review public
Do we know that the HolmanBarnsgroup will make the findings of the review public
I believe we will be supplied with the key recommendations but not the entire document.
Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!
My view on the chairman being reappointed for another 3 years is that both the HB group & WT boards agree that Lee is not the problem.
This is a sham review. The people doing the actual review may believe that everything is above board but I think there will only be a little window dressing on the final report.
My view on the chairman being reappointed for another 3 years is that both the HB group & WT boards agree that Lee is not the problem.
This is a sham review. The people doing the actual review may believe that everything is above board but I think there will only be a little window dressing on the final report.
IMO none of us can say this with any evidence at this stage. I think its an important point to note that the HB Board appointed the review and the WT board reappointed Lee. IMO start there for the reason why.
My view on the chairman being reappointed for another 3 years is that both the HB group & WT boards agree that Lee is not the problem.
This is a sham review. The people doing the actual review may believe that everything is above board but I think there will only be a little window dressing on the final report.
I can state that I am extremely confident that the review will contain recommendations that will make the majority of the fanbase happy. The review 100% is not a sham, whether the Holman Barnes Group decides to act on those recommendations is a completely different story. If they don't act on the recommendations, then there is going to be a lot pf pressure on them to do so as they have announced this review publicly and were still talking about it publicly as late as last week.
In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)
Do we know that the HolmanBarnsgroup will make the findings of the review public
I doubt that the full results will be made public as I am sure that it will contain some sensitive information but we hope and will be pushing for the recommendations to be made public.
Those decisions fall to the Holman Barnes Group but I believe that because they publicly announced the review then there needs to be a public response to the review.
In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)
My view on the chairman being reappointed for another 3 years is that both the HB group & WT boards agree that Lee is not the problem.
This is a sham review. The people doing the actual review may believe that everything is above board but I think there will only be a little window dressing on the final report.
1. There’s the HBG - they ordered the review.
2. WT board made their own decision to reappoint Lee (despite the review).
3. HBG gets review report/recommendations (when completed) and potentially 2 becomes irrelevant.
Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!
As I have stated before,I cannot see the HBG Directors knocking off any of their "own" that happen to be WT Directors.Without seeing or hearing anything, you have to think Pascoe is a dead duck and will be blamed for everything. Which I happen to disagree with.
Le Frog
As I have stated before,I cannot see the HBG Directors knocking off any of their "own" that happen to be WT Directors.Without seeing or hearing anything, you have to think Pascoe is a dead duck and will be blamed for everything. Which I happen to disagree with.
Le Frog
Pascoe is one of a group of 5 or 6 that need to ➡️🚪asap
Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!
Without seeing or hearing anything, you have to think Pascoe is a dead duck and will be blamed for everything. Which I happen to disagree with.
I don't think that will be the recommendation from the review.
In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)
The priority must be to get a high calibre/skilled board.
A high calibre board would recognise themselves if they had a below calibre CEO and make the change.
Top 8 2023
The 25 year emblem should have been
A fedora just above a pair of crossed wooden spoons
EXCLUSIVE
Major development out of the Wests Tigers.
Chairman Lee Hagipantelis on the brink of being overthrown after rejecting an invitation from the club’s majority shareholder to stand down from his position just days after being re-appointed
Chammas - SMH
Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!
A civil war is set to erupt at the Wests Tigers with chairman Lee Hagipantelis on the brink of being overthrown after rejecting an invitation from the club’s majority shareholder to stand down from his position just days after being re-appointed.
The Herald can also reveal that Tigers powerbrokers have discussed the possibility of bringing the likes of former NSW premier and ex-Tigers chairman Barry O’Farrell, as well as former Australian Olympic Committee president John Coates, onto the board in some capacity.
It comes in the midst of an external governance and culture review into the under-siege club that will place both Hagipantelis and chief executive Justin Pascoe under the microscope following the Tigers’ 12th consecutive season without a finals appearance.
The review has been called by the Holman Barnes Group, the 60 per cent majority shareholder of the club that also runs Wests Ashfield Leagues Club.
Sources talking under the condition of anonymity told this masthead that Tigers board member Tony Andreacchio, speaking on behalf of the Holman Barnes Group, recently contacted Hagipantelis to invite him to stand down as chairman.
Andreacchio also informed Hagipantelis that his tenure was only extended as an independent director and not as chairman despite News Corp last month reporting that Hagipantelis was re-elected as chairman of the Wests Tigers until November 2025.
The move could put the club’s near $1,000,000 a season major sponsorship deal with Hagipantelis’ company Bryden’s Lawyers in jeopardy.
Certain members of the board are now disputing the details around the motion that was passed at the meeting last month. The minutes of the meeting were taken by Tigers chief financial officer Mark Sawicki.
Hagipantelis is privately strongly refuting the notion that he was only extended as a director, and not as chairman.
“This review has been commissioned by the Holman Barnes group and all enquiries concerning the review should be directed to them”, Hagipantelis said when contacted for comment by this masthead.
Andreacchio did not want to be drawn into the specifics of his conversation with the chairman.
“At the moment we have an external review on the whole club,” he told this masthead. “It’s probably an inappropriate time to make any formal or informal comment at the moment. This review is very critical.
“The Holman Barnes Group is one of the major shareholders and are very much behind it. I think any comment doesn’t serve any purpose at the moment. Currently he is the chairman.”
The Wests Tigers constitution provides for up to nine directors to be appointed. At the moment there is only seven following the resignation of independent director James Myatt a month ago.
Sources talking under the condition of anonymity told this masthead that part of the reason the board moved to extend Hagipantelis’ tenure was to ensure the board remained validly constituted.
Under the constitution, the board has to have at least one independent director at all times. Hagipantelis is the only independent director currently on the board.
When asked if the Tigers wanted to bring O’Farrell or Coates on the board, Andreacchio insisted a decision wouldn’t be made until after the review.
“Independent directors are always open up to review to see who is available and who would like to come on,” he said. “It’s something we’re holding off on until the end of this review. Until then, there’ll be no further action. I don’t want to derail the review in any shape or form.”
The review is also a topic of great conjecture. Sources talking under the condition of anonymity have also questioned the independence of one of the two men appointed to undertake the review.
Former NRL chief financial officer Tony Crawford and Gary Barnier are in charge of the review set to be completed by the end of the month.
The questioning of independence surrounds Barnier, who is one of 13 Wests Tigers Foundation members announced on the club’s website that have donated $100,000 to the club over a four-year period. The Barnier Family is also listed as one of the “Foundation 13” with another $100,000 donation to the club. So too is Hagipantelis and Coates.
The donation for this group is a tax-deductible $100,000 for a lifetime involvement — it can be made in pairs and payment plans up to four years.
Barnier strongly opposes suggestion that his financial contribution means he has a conflict of interest.
“I took the decision to provide money to the club through that Foundation 13, which meant I could contribute - because I can afford to contribute - but I get nothing in return for it,” Barnier told this masthead.
“It’s just like a super-high level of membership, I suppose. That’s the beginning and end of it. I’m not getting paid for this review.
“I’ve offered to do it because of my emotional connection and my family’s emotional connection with the club. That’s all it is. I can’t think of any possible conflict of interest.”
Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!
