“Everyone has periods at the bottom of the ladder but if you work hard and have a plan in place you will get to the top of it.
We’re not like any other NRL club, and we don’t want to be like any other NRL club.
We’re outlaws. We want to be the No.1 club, but we want to do it our way.”
Shane Richardson
So, it's emerged that Richardson has approved a "get-out" clause that allows Luai to negotiate with other clubs after 2- of his 5- season contract at WT if he's not happy with how things are going. According to Chammas (SMH), Pascoe refused it, but Richo has relented to Laui and manager's demands.
Should have just announced a 2 year signing when he signed if this was the case.
In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)
@garry Sure, and it is Chammas reporting so that needs to be considered. But, if true ......? Marshall is under more pressure than before. Not that that's a bad thing.
So, it's emerged that Richardson has approved a "get-out" clause that allows Luai to negotiate with other clubs after 2- of his 5- season contract at WT if he's not happy with how things are going. According to Chammas (SMH), Pascoe refused it, but Richo has relented to Laui and manager's demands.
outstanding Richo well done lol
Galvin extending is blowing like a rusty gate
Yeah really puts a spanner in the plan to re sign Galvin. In the end it’s up to the club to show both players we are worthwhile but it’s very hard to retain the best talent when you offer these types of options. As if galvins manager won’t demand the same and then you have both your halves on a rolling one year deal. I get they had to do something and we have probably recruited well off the back of the Luai signing but it’s horrible that this has got out in the press.
If Galvin extends then Latu might come good in 2 years. One of them could take the 7. (I'm trying hard to be positive)
Really disappointing to discover this, but not entirely surprising. On the plus side it probably knocked $100-$200K pa off the Contract.
If things go well I hope the club looks to extend and take out the options.
Thinking this through. It was always too good to be true to that a 4 time premiership half would come to the tigers for what he could earn at several other clubs, including ones currently at the top of the league. If this was the cost of the deal then so be it
Thinking this through. It was always too good to be true to that a 4 time premiership half would come to the tigers for what he could earn at several other clubs, including ones currently at the top of the league. If this was the cost of the deal then so be it
Yep, just have to get on with it like he has a five year deal. It will be a constant distraction though.
Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!
For me Im not really worried about the clauses, I would have seen signing him for 2 years as a win when this was all announced. I just think we should have been upfront and disclosed the structure of the contract when he signed as finding out now has been quite deflating for a lot of the fanbase just as some positivity was starting to build.
In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)
If Galvin extends then Latu might come good in 2 years. One of them could take the 7. (I'm trying hard to be positive)
how long can we keep latu fainu for? he is probably cover for Galvin (managed by moses) think Galvin leaves at end of contract.
If Galvin extends then Latu might come good in 2 years. One of them could take the 7. (I'm trying hard to be positive)
how long can we keep latu fainu for? he is probably cover for Galvin (managed by moses) think Galvin leaves at end of contract.
That is a topic that hasn't really been spoken about hey. If Galvin stays then will Latu? If Latu goes then will the other Fainus? Obviously we don't know now but it will become and issue some day. I can't really see either Latu or Galvin moving into the forwards.
I think either of them could play at lock but not yet. They’re still in their teens so plenty of time to develop yet. There’s no doubt both want to play in the halves. And that might be something Latu has to deal with at this club. but maybe this season will tell us more in regards to Latu in particular, and whether Lachie will extend. I think it’s just best to enjoy watching them play and then at the backend of 2025 see how we feel about their futures.If Galvin extends then Latu might come good in 2 years. One of them could take the 7. (I'm trying hard to be positive)
how long can we keep latu fainu for? he is probably cover for Galvin (managed by moses) think Galvin leaves at end of contract.
That is a topic that hasn't really been spoken about hey. If Galvin stays then will Latu? If Latu goes then will the other Fainus? Obviously we don't know now but it will become and issue some day. I can't really see either Latu or Galvin moving into the forwards.
‘Their ambition is to see the Magpies replace the Wests Tigers’: Director’s stunning claim
By Michael Chammas
A director of the Holman Barnes Group, the majority owner of the Wests Tigers, has warned of a growing movement at board level to “see the Western Suburbs Magpies replace the Wests Tigers in the NRL”.
A text message sent by former HBG chairman turned director Tony Andreacchio to several club members and seen by the Herald outlines concerns over the direction of the organisation in charge of the Wests Tigers, which is currently chaired by Julie Romero.
Andreacchio, who is one of three board members currently suspended and expected to be removed as early as this weekend after facing a disciplinary hearing over alleged misconduct, has moved to try and expose the internal power play that could rock the foundations of the Wests Tigers.
“If the plan devised by these … individuals unfolds as expected later this week, our removal as directors will be finalised and our club membership will be banned indefinitely,” the text message sent by Andreacchio said.
“Consequently, the HBG will fall under the control of a cabal of four, supported by an outdated debenture holder system (currently comprising only 18 individuals). Their misguided ambition is to see the Western Suburbs Magpies replace the Wests Tigers in the NRL competition.”
When contacted for comment on Friday afternoon, Andreacchio – who previously served as chairman of the HBG for two-and-a-half years until he was overthrown by Romero in March this year – refused to discuss the text message but admitted he had grave fears for the future of the Wests Tigers.
“I’m not going to comment on a very private text message,” Andreacchio, a HBG director of 12 years, told this masthead.
“All I will say is that my only concern is the best interests of the Wests Tigers. Some on the board couldn’t cope with losing their blazers as part of the review. If I was a passionate Wests Tigers fan, of which I am, I would be very worried about the future of the merger.”
Romero did not respond to attempts to contact her on Friday.
Sources with knowledge of the situation talking on the condition of anonymity told this masthead that a high-ranking Wests Tigers official recently approached Australian Rugby League Commission chairman Peter V’landys with the same concerns.
The official contacted V’landys after learning that HBG director Dennis Burgess, who now holds a position on the Wests Tigers board, had been talking of an intention to bring back the Magpies in the NRL.
The allegations raised with V’landys included a claim that Burgess had told Balmain chairman Danny Stapleton at a game this year, “We’re bringing back the Wests Magpies”.
Burgess declined to comment when contacted on Friday night. “I have nothing to say,” he said.
The Wests Tigers official wanted to warn the NRL of the plan they believed was being devised by the new leadership of the HBG.
The Herald has also obtained a separate document, compiled by two club members and sent to Liquor and Gaming NSW. The document is a request for Liquor and Gaming NSW to appoint an administrator to the HBG, as happened at the Parramatta Eels almost a decade ago.
In the letter, it is claimed “There has been a total breakdown in the management of HBG in that the board is completely dysfunctional and the relationships so toxic, it is impossible for the board to operate effectively, or at all”.
The HBG, formerly known as the Wests Ashfield Leagues Club Group, is currently split into two factions. The faction on the outer consists of Andreacchio and directors Rick Wayde and David Gilbert, all of whom were once on the board of the Wests Tigers.
They are under investigation for what Wayde last month described as “trivial” allegations made against him and two other board members, among them not sitting with other directors at functions, calling an official’s wife “darl” and telling another she was in the wrong corporate box at a game.
Other allegations against a particular director includes referring to fellow board members as a “f—ing softie”, a “f—ing suck” and “parrots” in a raised voice.
It was further alleged that Andreacchio was in breach of his constitutional duty after he opposed attempts by a fellow director to change the Western Suburbs Magpies jersey to black and white in the lower grades, because he believed all teams should play under the Wests Tigers banner, including NSW Cup.
The trio of suspended directors were the driving force behind the implementation of the independent culture and governance review that led to the exit of former Wests Tigers chief executive Justin Pascoe and chairman Lee Hagipantelis.
Since then, Andreacchio has been overthrown as chair, with Romero and Burgess replacing the duo at the helm of the powerful club in March with the backing of fellow directors Stephen Montgomery (recently added to Wests Tigers board) and Vincent Tropiano.
The HBG has over 27,000 members. The board consists of seven members, two of whom are elected by general members and five of whom are elected by the remaining 18 living debenture holders. The constitution makes it difficult to effect significant change at a board level.
Andreacchio’s text message also claims that the Romero-aligned directors in power at HBG are opposed to the appointment of Shane Richardson as Wests Tigers chief executive and Barry O’Farrell as chairman.
“Whether I remain or return as a director is not the key issue,” the director said in his message to select members.
“What matters most is the continued success and prosperity of the HBG and the long-overdue revival of the Wests Tigers.”
The rise of Romero has also drawn the ire of Balmain. In August, this masthead reported that Balmain director Garry Leo was calling for Balmain to break away from the Wests Tigers and begin a campaign to reinstate the foundation club back in the NRL. Leo has since resigned from his role on the Balmain board.
At the heart of his frustration was growing angst over the behaviour and actions of the HBG, shared by some of his directors.
In a series of private emails obtained by the Herald, Balmain directors described the Wests Tigers majority owner as “incompetent”, “Machiavellian” and a “bunch of tin pots”.
The HBG board recently asked O’Farrell to reapply for his job after the expiry of his interim contract as chairman of the Wests Tigers following the removal of Hagipantelis on the back of a culture and governance review.
Balmain chairman Danny Stapleton, who is also a representative on the Wests Tigers board, sent an email to Balmain directors in August stating: “the split on the [HBG} board is real and decisive” and that Balmain had “challenges on our hands with the unrest at HBG board level”.
Stapleton also stated: “My understanding, and I have not been told formally, is that the controlling faction at HBG Board now wants to unwind the outcomes and recommendations of the review process and take back the control and running of Wests Tigers.”