Democracy lost arti...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Democracy lost article

(@helmesy)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4766
Topic starter  

An article I have written about how things have changed over the years (maybe not for the better).

https://weststigerspodcast.com.au/democracy-lost-wests-tigers-fans-now-have-no-say/

Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!


   
Garry reacted
Quote
Mike
 Mike
(@mike)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4554
 

Posted by: @helmesy

An article I have written about how things have changed over the years (maybe not for the better).

https://weststigerspodcast.com.au/democracy-lost-wests-tigers-fans-now-have-no-say/

Membership is just fan membership or season ticket holders if you like. It’s been that way since the Wests Tigers inception. Wests Tigers fans have NEVER had voting rights. So Wests Tigers fans haven’t lost anything, because they never had it in the first place. 

 


   
Jedi Tiger reacted
ReplyQuote
(@helmesy)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4766
Topic starter  

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @helmesy

An article I have written about how things have changed over the years (maybe not for the better).

https://weststigerspodcast.com.au/democracy-lost-wests-tigers-fans-now-have-no-say/

Membership is just fan membership or season ticket holders if you like. It’s been that way since the Wests Tigers inception. Wests Tigers fans have NEVER had voting rights. So Wests Tigers fans haven’t lost anything, because they never had it in the first place. 

 

True, but we had our foundation clubs and now we have zero.

 

Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!


   
ReplyQuote
Mike
 Mike
(@mike)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4554
 

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @helmesy

An article I have written about how things have changed over the years (maybe not for the better).

https://weststigerspodcast.com.au/democracy-lost-wests-tigers-fans-now-have-no-say/

Membership is just fan membership or season ticket holders if you like. It’s been that way since the Wests Tigers inception. Wests Tigers fans have NEVER had voting rights. So Wests Tigers fans haven’t lost anything, because they never had it in the first place. 

 

True, but we had our foundation clubs and now we have zero.

 

The fans should have representation at the board level, voted by the fans. Not necessarily the whole board but at least 1 or 2 board members representing and voted by fans. But that’s not how Wests Tigers was established.

A change is needed in the governance of Wests Tigers Rugby League Football Pty Ltd which holds the NRL issued Wests Tigers licence. 

 


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
(@helmesy)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4766
Topic starter  

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @helmesy

An article I have written about how things have changed over the years (maybe not for the better).

https://weststigerspodcast.com.au/democracy-lost-wests-tigers-fans-now-have-no-say/

Membership is just fan membership or season ticket holders if you like. It’s been that way since the Wests Tigers inception. Wests Tigers fans have NEVER had voting rights. So Wests Tigers fans haven’t lost anything, because they never had it in the first place. 

 

True, but we had our foundation clubs and now we have zero.

 

The fans should have representation at the board level, voted by the fans. Not necessarily the whole board but at least 1 or 2 board members representing and voted by fans. But that’s not how Wests Tigers was established.

A change is needed in the governance of Wests Tigers Rugby League Football Pty Ltd which holds the NRL issued Wests Tigers licence. 

 

Agreed.

 

Wests Tigers Podcast - Talking everything Wests Tigers!


   
ReplyQuote
(@russtutty63)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1254
 

Some representation of the members on the Board, voted in by the members, would seem fair. Just one. Would empower the membership base in some small way I guess, probably more of a symbolic appointment then anything but better than what they have now. What kind of process would be involved in allowing that to happen?


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
(@tigertownsfs)
Wests Magpies NSW Cup
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2009
 

Posted by: @russtutty63

Some representation of the members on the Board, voted in by the members, would seem fair. Just one. Would empower the membership base in some small way I guess, probably more of a symbolic appointment then anything but better than what they have now. What kind of process would be involved in allowing that to happen?

 

West Ashfield Board would have to approve of changes to the Wests Tigers Board so only way would be to lobby Andreacchio

 


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3846
 

Personally, I am firmly of the opinion that fans should have zero involvement in the running of a professional sports team/club/franchise. Because we love the club does not make us any more qualified to have input or make decisions. A reminder that Balmain and Wests we both "members run" which ran both clubs into the ground to the point where they had to merge and sacrifice their identity to survive.

The argument that by some means "fans/members" should be able to remove board members by some mechanism is also IMO a poor one. A board needs security of tenure so that it has the authority and confidence to make tough, hard or unpopular opinions for the good of the club without worrying that by doing something unpopular (which might be the right thing to do) that a fan uprising will cull them and strike down the decision making role of the board. I have seen fan forums overrun but little populist uprisings let alone unleashing that level of unprofessionalism on the club. Parra & Bulldogs, although seemingly stable now had fan led turmoil for years with factions wrecking their boards.

 

Finally IMO a "token" position on a board representing fans, simply dilutes the board in that that postion has no power.

 

TLDR, I think fans should be kept as far as possible from running the club.


   
Skippa13 reacted
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3846
 

Posted by: @russtutty63

Some representation of the members on the Board, voted in by the members, would seem fair. Just one. Would empower the membership base in some small way I guess, probably more of a symbolic appointment then anything but better than what they have now. What kind of process would be involved in allowing that to happen?

 

It would be totally symbolic which means you have simply diluted the board with one position being completely powerless and useless. Would much rather that position being filled by a genuinely independent (not "independent" like Stapletone) board member with business/marketing/financial expertise.

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3846
 

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @helmesy

An article I have written about how things have changed over the years (maybe not for the better).

https://weststigerspodcast.com.au/democracy-lost-wests-tigers-fans-now-have-no-say/

Membership is just fan membership or season ticket holders if you like. It’s been that way since the Wests Tigers inception. Wests Tigers fans have NEVER had voting rights. So Wests Tigers fans haven’t lost anything, because they never had it in the first place. 

 

True, but we had our foundation clubs and now we have zero.

 

The fans should have representation at the board level, voted by the fans.

 

 

Why?

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3846
 

Good article by the way @Helmesy. Good food for discussion.


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
Mike
 Mike
(@mike)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4554
 

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @helmesy

An article I have written about how things have changed over the years (maybe not for the better).

https://weststigerspodcast.com.au/democracy-lost-wests-tigers-fans-now-have-no-say/

Membership is just fan membership or season ticket holders if you like. It’s been that way since the Wests Tigers inception. Wests Tigers fans have NEVER had voting rights. So Wests Tigers fans haven’t lost anything, because they never had it in the first place. 

 

True, but we had our foundation clubs and now we have zero.

 

The fans should have representation at the board level, voted by the fans.

 

 

Why?

 

So that at the Board Level there is some accountability directly to all stakeholders, and that include the fans who pay for the privilege of supporting the club. The Board members elected by the fans could actually add some professionalism to the Company which it is currently lacking. I would think those Board Members elected by the fans would have a professional background and not just be a rich person who buys their way in, which is the current situation for most current Board members. 

 


   
Joel Helmes reacted
ReplyQuote
Garry
(@garry)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 5006
 

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @helmesy

Posted by: @mike

Posted by: @helmesy

An article I have written about how things have changed over the years (maybe not for the better).

https://weststigerspodcast.com.au/democracy-lost-wests-tigers-fans-now-have-no-say/

Membership is just fan membership or season ticket holders if you like. It’s been that way since the Wests Tigers inception. Wests Tigers fans have NEVER had voting rights. So Wests Tigers fans haven’t lost anything, because they never had it in the first place. 

 

True, but we had our foundation clubs and now we have zero.

 

The fans should have representation at the board level, voted by the fans.

 

 

Why?

 

So that at the Board Level there is some accountability directly to all stakeholders, and that include the fans who pay for the privilege of supporting the club. The Board members elected by the fans could actually add some professionalism to the Company which it is currently lacking. I would think those Board Members elected by the fans would have a professional background and not just be a rich person who buys their way in, which is the current situation for most current Board members. 

 

I doubt that would happen under a popular vote, I have my opinions on who would get in and it wouldn't be beneficial.

 

In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)


   
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3846
 

Posted by: @mike

The fans should have representation at the board level, voted by the fans.

 

Why?

 

Posted by: @mike

So that at the Board Level there is some accountability directly to all stakeholders,

How would a fan occupying one seat on the board contribute any accountibility in practical terms? Not having a crack at you, but in practice, how would it change what the board does?

Posted by: @mike

and that include the fans who pay for the privilege of supporting the club.

Wests Ashfield are the stakeholders, fans are customers. Stark reality.

Posted by: @mike

The Board members elected by the fans could actually add some professionalism to the Company which it is currently lacking. I would think those Board Members elected by the fans would have a professional background.

 

Explain to me how the board member elected by fans would not be Demps or Rob Bechara? That is the reality of this proposal.

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3846
 

Just to clarify my point, Im not wrapped in the current board but IMO fan involvement is not the answer.

But to further make the point, if fans could, which board member would you sack or replace? We have zero knowledge of what they do. Personally I'd sack Dennis Burgess, purely based on the way he presents, but he might be fantastic on the board.


   
ReplyQuote
Page 1 / 26
Share: