Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Rd 11 Wests Tigers v Souths Live Game Day Thread (Contains Spoilers)

(@Anonymous 79)
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1586
 

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @Anonymous

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @tiger5150

especially not scoring a point, but Brooks did have a good game

I think that is the problem right there, he played a good game today but just isn't creating enough opportunities. Even at his best he hasn't been creative enough in the redzone.

 

This is unarguable....on his own. If he had help it might be different. We need to replace at least 1.5 halves. Wakeham is trying and 100% playing his best, but isnt good enough. We MUST replace Wakeham as a priority and then look at replacing Brooks.

 

Brandon is not the problem Imo

 

 

Brooks created more chances than Wakeham. IF Wakham is not the problem, he sure as hell isnt the solution. Clearly neither half is creating enough chances in their 20,

 

what about his two kicks in the red zone that went sideways… like his career!!!

over it !!!

 


   
ReplyQuote
The Last Ronin
(@the-last-ronin)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2213
 

Posted by: @jedi-tiger

@loganr21 so wakeham played we today ? please he is not nrl level 

if we get a Shaun Johnson to play 7 then Brooks can play 6

For the remainder of the year I would give Laurie a run at 6 with brooks

Wakeham is a reserve grader and everyone knows that. 

 


   
ReplyQuote
The Last Ronin
(@the-last-ronin)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2213
 

@tiger5150 if we are honest Brooks, Wakeham and Doueihi are all the problem and none are the solution


   
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3783
 

Posted by: @Anonymous

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @Anonymous

Posted by: @tiger5150

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @tiger5150

especially not scoring a point, but Brooks did have a good game

I think that is the problem right there, he played a good game today but just isn't creating enough opportunities. Even at his best he hasn't been creative enough in the redzone.

 

This is unarguable....on his own. If he had help it might be different. We need to replace at least 1.5 halves. Wakeham is trying and 100% playing his best, but isnt good enough. We MUST replace Wakeham as a priority and then look at replacing Brooks.

 

Brandon is not the problem Imo

 

 

Brooks created more chances than Wakeham. IF Wakham is not the problem, he sure as hell isnt the solution. Clearly neither half is creating enough chances in their 20,

 

what about his two kicks in the red zone that went sideways… like his career!!!

over it !!!

 

 

They were rubbish. Your point being? How were Wakehams kicks in the red zone? Wakehams passing game in the red zone?

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@tiger5150)
Wests Tigers Development Player
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3783
 

Posted by: @the-last-ronin

@tiger5150 if we are honest Brooks, Wakeham and Doueihi are all the problem and none are the solution

 

Totally agree. My point is that we are very unlikely to snap up an NRL quality 7 and an NRL quality 6 between now and Feb 24. The priority for recruitment should be a 7 with a great passing and kicking game (particularly short). Grab that player and Wakeham doesnt play firsts. Then our priority should be a 6 that is good NRL standard, grab that player and then Brooks doesnt play NRL. Doueihi has a lot to worry about before worrying about NRL.

 


   
ReplyQuote
Crowsnest
(@crowsnest)
Balmain Tigers SG Ball
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 558
 

@the-last-ronin I get it. Can Sheens and Marshall fix this?

If we won today would we be saying all this. Top v bottom. Remind me of all this in 4 weeks time 👍


   
ReplyQuote
The Last Ronin
(@the-last-ronin)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2213
 

@tiger5150 we are on the same page. I’ve been saying for a while I can take Brooks as 6 if we get a quality 7 mainly because I know we aren’t going to get a decent 7&6 at the same time.


   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 79)
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1586
 

Posted by: @the-last-ronin

Posted by: @jedi-tiger

@loganr21 so wakeham played we today ? please he is not nrl level 

if we get a Shaun Johnson to play 7 then Brooks can play 6

For the remainder of the year I would give Laurie a run at 6 with brooks

Wakeham is a reserve grader and everyone knows that. 

 

well we’ve got a 199 game player that should be a reserve grader too

 


   
ReplyQuote
The Last Ronin
(@the-last-ronin)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2213
 

Posted by: @crowsnest

@the-last-ronin I get it. Can Sheens and Marshall fix this?

If we won today would we be saying all this. Top v bottom. Remind me of all this in 4 weeks time 👍

this season? No 

would we be saying it if we won? No because we would have taken our chances. The reason it feels like Groundhog Day is because it is. 

Well in 5 weeks/4 games we play the Storm so it come be 1st v last again 😉

 


   
ReplyQuote
The Last Ronin
(@the-last-ronin)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2213
 

Posted by: @Anonymous

Posted by: @the-last-ronin

Posted by: @jedi-tiger

@loganr21 so wakeham played we today ? please he is not nrl level 

if we get a Shaun Johnson to play 7 then Brooks can play 6

For the remainder of the year I would give Laurie a run at 6 with brooks

Wakeham is a reserve grader and everyone knows that. 

 

well we’ve got a 199 game player that should be a reserve grader too

 

I agree. I was more defending Wakeham as he is the level everyone knows he is. Brooks on the other hand seems to have people insisting he’s a first grader 

 


   
ReplyQuote
Crowsnest
(@crowsnest)
Balmain Tigers SG Ball
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 558
 

@the-last-ronin oh your a spoil sport 🤣 TMNT never surrender.


   
ReplyQuote
Garry
(@garry)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4944
 

Posted by: @tiger5150

Brooks created more chances than Wakeham. IF Wakham is not the problem, he sure as hell isnt the solution. Clearly neither half is creating enough chances in their 20,

Wakeham is exactly what we bought, a reserve grade half. I can't throw much blame in his direction, he is playing the exact level we should have expected from him.

 

In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)


   
ReplyQuote
The Last Ronin
(@the-last-ronin)
Wests Tigers Jersey Flegg
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2213
 

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @tiger5150

Brooks created more chances than Wakeham. IF Wakham is not the problem, he sure as hell isnt the solution. Clearly neither half is creating enough chances in their 20,

Wakeham is exactly what we bought, a reserve grade half. I can't throw much blame in his direction, he is playing the exact level we should have expected from him.

 

this is true and the saddest part about that statement is we let Madden and Hastings go and sign Wakeham at the 11th hour in desperation. Those two aren’t world beaters but probably offer more than Wakeham 

 


   
ReplyQuote
Garry
(@garry)
Wests Tigers Development Player Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4944
 

Posted by: @the-last-ronin

Posted by: @garry

Posted by: @tiger5150

Brooks created more chances than Wakeham. IF Wakham is not the problem, he sure as hell isnt the solution. Clearly neither half is creating enough chances in their 20,

Wakeham is exactly what we bought, a reserve grade half. I can't throw much blame in his direction, he is playing the exact level we should have expected from him.

 

this is true and the saddest part about that statement is we let Madden and Hastings go and sign Wakeham at the 11th hour in desperation. Those two aren’t world beaters but probably offer more than Wakeham 

 

Madden was offered the backup role that ultimately went to Wakeham but didn't want it. Hastings we should have kept but I couldn't have matched his offer from the Knights for next year but would have made him stay this year.

 

In memory of Geoff Chisholm (1965-2022)


   
ReplyQuote
Avo
 Avo
(@avocadoontoast)
Wests Tigers Development Player Moderator
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3246
 

Comparing Brooks to Wakeham is pretty unfair. You’re comparing a guy on minimum wage who came to play backup to one of the highest paid players in the game. I think Brooks is the better player but he’s delivering value to the team that is about $800k below what he’s getting paid. Wakeham is performing as he should given what he’s paid.

Our problems are ALL our halves. None of them are part of the solution.


   
ReplyQuote
Page 11 / 13
Share: